If the Taurus was really built without regard to cost and with only performance as the goal, then it certainly would not be using a cylinder and piston from a concrete saw. They would have designed their own cylinder, and it wouldn't be piston ported. You really expect anyone to believe that Makita happened to develop the best cylinder for an airplane engine propped to 6500-7000 rpm when they were manufacturing concrete saw engines? Could it be that Taurus just selected an inexpensive and durable cylinder/piston from an industrial engine because it would keep the cost of their engine low? Kind of like Brison and Fox?

I hope I don't get the last word here....so the BS flows like wine.


Stalspin wouldn't be Mr. Taurus (L'il Bull) ....would he? The prose looks familiar.