RCU Forums - View Single Post - Why the AMA is not growing...........
View Single Post
Old 08-15-2006 | 10:00 PM
  #207  
NorfolkSouthern
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,588
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Default RE: Why the AMA is not growing...........

To actually take flight training as a student pilot, then get the pilot's license, yes it does cost considerably more than flying models, KidEpoxy. With that, I absolutely agree. I was making my statement on the assumption that a full-scale plane is chartered along with the pilot, rather than actually being used for lessons. The most likely application for this would be aerial photography. I did quote the price of the Cessna 150 wrong, though. The actual cost is $69.00 plus $40.00 for the instructor, per hour. Sorry about the error, but I ended up checking at the local FBO after my post.

As for aerial photography, I see a great potential for growth here, as a manned aircraft just can't get into the places that a small line of sight UAV can. There is one company that now makes blimps that are small in size, yet serve the purpose very well. Helicopters can also be used, and fixed wing is probably the most cost effective type of aircraft to consider. Perhaps the AMA could promote aerial photography as a practical use for the models, as it may attract the interest of people looking into vocational interests. I know I would like to think of more uses for my plane, rather than just flying around at the local club.

NorfolkSouthern