ORIGINAL: Phaedrus-MMVI
ORIGINAL: littlecrankshaf
ORIGINAL: Phaedrus-MMVI
Which is my point. NO insurance company releases detailed information on their claim history. So the fact that AMA does not does NOT mean that they are trying to hide anything. Further, it makes claims that they have a bad history unfounded.
I am having trouble with the logic asserted here. How does the
absence of "detailed information about claim history"
negate claims of a bad history and therefore make any such claims unfounded?
Many feel that since no information is released this is because the AMA has something to hide. COnversely, since no information is released how can you say you know about "bad claims history"? Please cite the facts of the cases that you, or anybody else, feels supports your position.
I guess we should define "bad claims history" first.