Mike-
thanx for the input.

I'd like to point out that Safe and Not Reckless are not the same.
Is flying on a 737 safe? Ask the folks in Brazil. Flying on a 737 was not safe for them, but it was not reckless of them.

Is flying Combat safe? No, accidents do happen, and damages do occur, but the frequency & severity of the accidents are minimized with precautions & measures taken- a set of rules change it from reckless to non-reckless. Now apply that to Gunnery like it is applied to Combat.

Neither Combat nor Gunnery are Safe. But both can be done non-recklessly ... unrecklessly... not reclessly... see, I just think Reckfully flows better than that: Reckless & Reckfull


Before we can describe what precautions should be observed, we have to first admit that there is some ammount of precautions that can make it not reckless, then strike a balance of risk abatement vs 6volume set of rules..... how reckless is reckless?

This is of course hingeing on SC#3 as the only rule found so far that might be interpreted to bar Gunnery. Has any other more definitive rule barring Gunnery been found?

Professionals shooting off fireworks is intentional.
Shooting off fireworks is not safe.
Shooting off fireworks can be done non-recklessly

or put Demolition Derby in there, same thing