Looks like it always come down to the courts. If something bad did happen at a paintball R/C shoot and AMA says no to the insurance based on SC #3, then the courts will be the ones to decide and the lawyers from both sides will be all over SC #3 like flies on you know what to prove or disprove if there was any recklessness on the club's part. I think this all points out that AMA needs to do some more clarifying on SC #3. And clubs doing this event should leave nothing to chance on safety precautions. I wonder if other activities like crazy fun fly events would end up under the scrutiny of SC #3 if something bad happened. It could go on and on.