to prove or disprove if there was any recklessness on the club's part. I think this all points out that AMA needs to do some more clarifying on SC #3. And clubs doing this event should leave nothing to chance on safety precautions.
Amen to that.
STL- you really see no similartity in an event that can and does cause planes to go out of control, and an event that can & will cause planes to go out of control? Can't draw the parrallel there?
Inurance? Sure, I wasnt reckless, so I've got AMA insurance.
Own anything? There was a reason I got a Nevada Shell Corp to hide assets in, I lived in california & didnt want to lose everything over spilled coffe or a wet floor or lost wages of a burgler I may shoot.
Me?
I'm not Tim the OP claiming this was Verboten
I'm not the guys doin the shootin
I'm just wondering how some dangerous things are ok, and some arent, just by if it has a AMA pdf.... and whynot have that PDF written? I'm just wondering why we let the insurance co use the vague & broad phrasing of anything Reckless will void the insurance, without any definition as to what is reckless, and by who's standards? Pilot? CD? Club? AMA? Insurance lawyer's? yup, I bet it just happen's to be the lawyers.
anyhoo
Is it against the code? Not if you dont do it recklessly.