Why do you keep comparing RC firing range to RC combat?
This statement came from the same guy that made this statement:
A lot of people thought Michael Jackson was innocent. Would those same people let their kids spend the nite in his house?
I think the first comparison is far more valad.
Anyway there seems to be a lot of concern for damaging the receiver and being a helpless spectator of an out of control plane. Well I will ask again. Have any of you ever fired an airsoft gun? These things will shred cardboard but pad that cardboard with foam and there is not enough energy to even dent it. Your Red Ryder BB gun you got for Christmas back in '52 when your dad got the Leg Lamp would have more penitration and energy impacting the receiver. Bottom line that is a dead issue the receiver can be protected far better for a "Aerial Gunnery Event" then the antena wire can be for a combat event. (There is that comparison again.)