RCU Forums - View Single Post - The better engine
View Single Post
Old 10-10-2006 | 07:11 AM
  #24  
rmh's Avatar
rmh
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,630
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
From: , UT
Default RE: The better engine

yep -I expected a similar reply - and I understand the reasons - not at all offended
I have built warbirds for others- (Dave Platt P51's etc.. and was appalled at the construction.)
I have plans waiting for a Brit designed Spit I will do someday
The typical kit for a warbird is frankly a stone but some of the new ARFS are very good - I did a big H9 Mustang (for a customer) and stuck a Roto 35 in it . It worked fine.
I know that most warbird guys ar not into quiet engines and aerobatic setups - but there are some that are -
The Spitfire was a pretty good aerobat in original form and the 40, completely fitted in and with a smooth exhaust note, really appeals to me.