RCU Forums - View Single Post - Programming Question
View Single Post
Old 10-17-2006 | 04:18 PM
  #10  
aegis
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Tempe, AZ
Default RE: Programming Question

What is the end point setting on the radio and on the programmer?

When I program my 5945s for elevator servos , I used 130 on radio, and about 120 on the programmer. Set the neutral to 0 on radio as well.
My TX's endpoints are set to 140% (I have a JR 8103 radio; goes up to 150%)

My programming values on this particular servo came out to be -88 and +110. My subtrims are all set to zero.

Try utilizing another model memory maybe something is occurring in the mixing.
That did the trick. I programmed the elevator channel on a different model memory, and the servo's movement followed the TX stick's movement throughout its range on both low and high rates. Rather than programming everything in the new model memory, I copied the TX's programmed info from the original model memory into the new one. Guess what? The servo stopped moving part way through the TX stick's movement again when going to high rates. I cleared the elevator channel and the mixed channel on both model memories and reprogrammed the elevator channels but the servo still stopped moving part way through the stick's movement when in either memory. I cleared everything from the original model memory and reprogrammed everything from scratch. After doing so, the elevator servo and the servo on the mixed channel follow the stick's movement throughout its range on both low and high rates. Prior to clearing the original model memory, I went through each menu on the original model memory but didn't see anything out of order. When I reprogrammed the original model memory I used the exact settings that were there to begin with, so I'm not sure what exactly was causing it. There was something somewhere though given it isn't doing now, plus given it started doing the same thing when I copied the original model memory into the new model memory.

Thanks for the suggestion, Michael!

Dan