Orig ModeOne:
Orig Redfox:
doing a low high speed inverted pass. We were trying to drag our rudder on the ground I was flying my tower uproar.
<snip>
AMA rep concidered the flying irresposible and in violation of AMA rules and denided the claim.
If what you are saying is the truth about the type of flying taking place, how can you wonder about the AMA's refusal to accept this claim?!?!
so after this type of flying in particular was found to be a safety violation, it was listed as forbidden in the SafetyCode to prevent aothers from making the same mistake? Or was it a Secret Rule that tail touch is ok, unless inverted.... Can we TailTouch- sure, if you do it you find out only the hard way that there was the Secret NOT INVERTED clause for tail touching.
To say there is no need to list every little thing that is forbidden, only invites repeating history... clearly not having the Secret Rule written did allow someone to try it, and now that we see folks will try it, why hasnt the Secret Rule been published- either in the SC or in MA (what do we pay $18 for a fed req mailing of Important Club Info for, if it doesnt get these SecretRules out to us?)
Here is a value, have $18 taken for a direct AMA info source that doesnt get the secret Inverted Tail Touch clause nor the Alledged PaintBall Ban out to the members..... but we can see plenty of ads in it