RCU Forums - View Single Post - Another Myth busted?
View Single Post
Old 11-22-2006 | 07:38 AM
  #6  
DarZeelon's Avatar
DarZeelon
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 8,913
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Rosh-HaAyin, ISRAEL
Default RE: Another Myth busted?

ORIGINAL: downunder

But because it was now running 1000 revs faster I decided on one final check by reducing the revs to the original 12,000 on the APC. That gave a head temp of 200F but was right on the verge of 4 stroking rich. Which would have been perfect for running in anyway.

So a fine pitch prop cools just as well as any other.
Brian,


This is not very typical of you, to reduce the RPM by running the engine as rich as a hog...

You were supposed to do it by using a larger diameter prop, with a 4" pitch, so the RPM would be reduced back to 12K...

AND, break-in as mostly done even by you, on an ABx engine (when you are not too busy trying to break one of my 'myths'...), the engine is richened to 500-800 RPM below peak; not 1,800 RPM.
So on the 10x6, the engine should have been spun at about 13,000-13,300 RPM.

The Xx4 prop that you were to use should also have peaked at 13,800... Possibly an 11.5x4 APC and it should also have been spun at about 13,000-13,300 RPM, for your "test".

AND, I hope you were using a thermo-couple, glow-plug-gasket sender type thermometer; not one of those totally worthless, infra-red, visual thermometers.


I am really flattered by you regarding things that I write as 'mythical'.
I just wonder why you try to break them all... Just regard them as axioms. They work; don't they?

-----------------------------

The Pope,


Don't call me 'the pope'. I am too Jewish to be one...