L-93 is not the same as 93. 93 will, unless a change is made in policy from what it is right now, be issued to some future president of the AMA. Arguing is not worth the bandwidth, except that someone may read this and be misinformed without the clarifications.
The AMA does have policies about its numbering system and the policies are available on request.
ORIGINAL: Hossfly
model.flyer: "Littlecrankshaf addressed only 3 digit, 2 digit, and single digit AMA numbers. My post was a response to him. I will stand by what I posted. 2 digit numbers are still reserved for AMA presidents. Your statement about these 2 digit numbers is in error. "
Darn, I was just beginning to give some credence to a number of your posts. Oh well I can change my erroneous ways. You can stick to yours. When I paid my Life dues, the lady asked if I wanted a lower #. I said "Sure" as 2 in the club had lower #s and I could go up the seniority roster.[>:] She said AMA 93 is available. I said fine, and so it is. L is allowed for life members, and if they elected to remain XXXX2X it would be LXXXX2X. NBFD.