ORIGINAL: Phaedrus-MMVI
They have all foolishly, and apparently incorrectly, required clubs or other groups to require AMA membership to use a site located on public lands AND in parks.
Can
you please substantiate your assertions or do we just take your interpretation as the gospel. Look Phaedrus-MMVI, You have made the claim so back it up...not just he said they said stuff but point to the document that supports your claim(s). If you can't back it up or don't want to, you get exactly 0 points for your argument. Keep in mind if the agreement stresses that a club will maintain AMA affiliation is quite different than requiring the club to acquire affiliation...small point but germane to the interpretation of said agreement.