Originally posted by banktoturn
Steve,
Actually, in the general case, there's no way to know that filling in the concavity on the lower surface will result in about half the camber. Whether this is true depends on the chordwise thickness distribution.
Actually since we're presumably quoting the maximum camber (or is that not what a camber percentage means ?) doesn't it depend entirely on the thickness at the max camber point ? In the specific case we were asked about i.e. a single surface wing (thickness approximates zero) it will be half unless I completely misunderstand camber (not impossible

).
I do agree that it's worth trying to educate people to use the correct terminology but not at the expense of turning their fairly straightforward question into a complex generalisation instead of answering it. Certainly it would/has put me off asking anything now I feel that the "answers" I get are more likely to explain why my question is wrong rather than tell me what will happen.
I guess I'm just not suited to this forum.
Steve