RCU Forums - View Single Post - 2 vs. 4 Stroke
View Single Post
Old 01-26-2007 | 01:07 PM
  #27  
NM2K
Senior Member
My Feedback: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,488
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Ringgold, GA
Default RE: 2 vs. 4 Stroke


ORIGINAL: B.L.E.


ORIGINAL: skiman762


ORIGINAL: 8178

Nine cylinders are pretty wimpy compared to the mother of all radials, the Wright R-3350 with eighteen cylinders plus power recovery turbines.
We must not forget the Mac Daddy of them all the P&W R-4360 28cyl Wasp Major pumping out 4300 horsepower a tad more the Wrights 2800hp
and I believe the Russians had a radial diesel boat engine that was 42 cyl and put out 6000hp not a plane engine but a radial none the less
The Lone Star Museum of Flight located at the Galveston TX airport (Scholes Field) has a P&W R-4360 on display in cut away form so you can see all the moving parts. Let's see, 28 cylinders = 56 valves that need adjusting, and 56 spark plugs (dual ignition I assume) to change, HOO BOY!!! This engine had the misfortune of being invented just in time to be made obsolete by jet propulsion.

-------------


Four rows of seven cylinders? Wow!


Ed Cregger