RCU Forums - View Single Post - Power vs. Weight vs. Reliablity vs. Ease of Use vs........
Old 02-14-2007 | 03:17 PM
  #3  
NM2K
Senior Member
My Feedback: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,488
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Ringgold, GA
Default RE: Power vs. Weight vs. Reliablity vs. Ease of Use vs........

If the Giles that you selected is their 1.40 rated model, I'd forget about the smaller displacement engines. They had two versions of this a while back. One was rated for a 1.20 and the other was rated at 1.40.

I'd have dropped the OS 1.20 pumper and kept the YS 1.10 in the line up for a 1.20 sized model. The 1.10 is more powerful than the OS. Central Hobbies sells the YS's much cheaper than some of the other places they are sold. I like the OS 1.20 pumper, but powerful, it isn't.

I would be tempted to buy an OS 1.20AX or 1.60FX two-stroke and fit it with a Cline type of regulator. You can burn 5% nitro fuel and produce the same power as all of the four-strokes that you have mentioned. Granted, throttle response won't be as razor-sharp as the YS engines burning 30% nitro, but it will only cost slightly more than half of the YS 1.40.

If you are going Saito, forget the 1.50. For just a few dollars more I'd get the 1.80, but also with a Cline type of regulator.

I just sold a NIB 1.40 Sport on eBay. It was like hanging a dead fish in the air over the side of a boat. Bids were coming in nearly as fast as emails of guys trying to get me to end the bidding early, or to ship it overseas for someone. It is a popular engine.

To me, the only two real choices are the YS 1.40 and the Saito 1.80. But that is just me. Good luck making your decision.


Ed Cregger