RCU Forums - View Single Post - Is aerodynamic thinking changing?
View Single Post
Old 02-22-2007 | 07:48 PM
  #5  
B.L.E.'s Avatar
B.L.E.
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Austin, TX
Default RE: Is aerodynamic thinking changing?


ORIGINAL: HighPlains

What's that, maybe 40 gallons of fuel per passenger for a 3,000 mile trip. Beats hell out of taking a boat and producing the food to feed them for 10 days.

Exactly what I was thinking! If all the passengers rode motorcycles for 3000 miles, they would collectively use a lot more fuel than that airliner does.

Fuel economy = profit for airlines so there is no need for government intervention. I foresee a continuing set of incremental improvements, not some radical design change. More efficient engines, lighter composite materials, etc. Compare a modern car to the old clunkers we drove in the 1960's. They are radically better in every way, but, it came about from the cumulative effect of a series of incremental improvements, not from some revolutionary discovery.

In spite of all the hyperbole about the advantages of canards, flying wings, and lifting bodies, the fact that most all competition RC sailplanes are conventional wing, fusilage, and rear stabilizer designs tells a lot about just how terrible the conventional airplane is not.