RE: ANYONE EVER USED A SUPERCHARGER?
SUPERCHARGER
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) - Cite This Source
su·per·charg·er /ˈsupərˌtʃɑrdʒər/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[soo-per-chahr-jer] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun [b]a mechanism for forcing air into an internal-combustion engine in order to increase engine power.
Could someone show me a mechanism small enough to operate from the power of an engine to force air into an intake or carb on an engine .32 or less, please
If there was such a devise the power it would take to run it would render it inefective
TURBOCHARGER
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) - Cite This Source
tur·bo·charg·er /ˈtɜrboʊˌtʃɑrdʒər/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[tur-boh-chahr-jer] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun a supercharger that is driven by a turbine turned by exhaust gases from the engine.
Also called turbo.
I think I just finished with supercharger but just for the sake of argument if there were such a devise made for the small scale engines and it was a turbine it would be fueled by exhaust. Even though a 2 cycle engine preforms in some cases better with back presure, the ammount needed to run a super charger would render an engine the size of .32 or less to less power than it had. But someone could show me a turbo that works on these little engines please. I want one
NITROUS OXIDE INJECTION
That is something that works
It does work but in order to oxidize the fuel properly it must be controled properly to get the right effect. If it is used to boost the power of one of these small engines to any great extent it would limit the life of the engine tremendisly. So rather than take the chance of scattering an engine in one fail swoop why not get a longer effect out of the engine and run a 40% + mixture and have a controled explosion.