My point was that any additional revenue stream to offset costs and keep dues down was a good thing, and that this is done throughout the non-profit industry. This is in direct response to the origonal posted question. Discussing the specifics of the P&L statement is not within the confines of the conversation. My statements were generality's. Furhter since the labor is donated and the machine is already owned, than there is absolutely NO DOWNSIDE whatsoever.
The AMA ought to be applauded for the efort and hopefully this is just the start. hey still need to cut costs , but this is a win for the AMA.