RCU Forums - View Single Post - JetJoe OWNERS thread
View Single Post
Old 06-07-2007 | 11:35 AM
  #1004  
rcdriver22's Avatar
rcdriver22
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Newcastle, UNITED KINGDOM
Default RE: JetJoe OWNERS thread


ORIGINAL: causeitflies-RCU

I think the two piece cone is little more efficient but the one piece is easier to produce. Two piece cones were known for coming apart so the small gain may not be worth it.
I think the efflux area was reduced on the one piece at the cost of sightly higher temps but with an increase in thrust. That might also be why the gas turbine builders assocation members found that there was no benefit to smoothing the efflux jet in the rear centre of the turbine wheel on small turbines. Cost was never a consideration to home grown metal bashers but it was amazing how things were done in one way just because thats the way everyone had done it for years. I'll ask the GTBA guys for verification but I know my turbines Chinese or British when upgraded lost the two piece.

Paul