RE: C.G.Nextar
Thanks for your input.
Seems that the general consensus on this and other forums is that the Nextar is only marginal as a trainer. I bought it as an arf and obtained the readings while beginning the reconstruction. Also noted that the engine was offset 3/8 inch left to compensate for the 1 degree rt. thrust. Measured at firewall. I am curious as to how the "designer"arrived at these parameters,when they deviate so much from the successful formulas put forth in this forum.
Will rebuild with 2 degrees rt. thrust/engine offset appx. 5/32", c.g. closer to center of lift. Should this cause me to put her in the "boneyard", I will have gained $99 worth of knowledge and saved myself further grief from this "airplane".