RCU Forums - View Single Post - Klemm L 25 VS. De Havilland DH 94
View Single Post
Old 08-12-2007 | 02:39 PM
  #20  
timfarrar's Avatar
timfarrar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Houston, TX
Default RE: Klemm L 25 VS. De Havilland DH 94

Frank :
And how about this one; on this website you'll find a 1:3 scale (wingspan 170" ) KLemm25d
Thanks, thats a neat site but that's to big for me

Red B.
If you want to go the ARC route this Krick 1:4.5 Klemm 25 would be an excellent choice. Wing span is approx 113 in. and the weight is only 16.5 lbs.
If you would like to build a smaller Klemm 25 I can recommend the 1:7 scale Krick Klemm 25 from personal experience. It is an absolute delight both to build and fly. A small OS30 or Saito 30 four-stroke engine is more than enough engine.
Thanks, Although that ARC is the right size I am wanting to build. But I have found the smaller 73" version you mentioned at this website for $214.00 shipped.
http://www.sussex-model-centre.co.uk...d.asp?id=20902
I may end up doing that.

R 101 :
I have built 2 Klemms over the years. The first was for i.c. and the second for electric.
Both were great flyers.
As stated above, the Moth Minor is a completely different aircraft.
Thanks for the pic's, Those are some beautiful planes you built there !

I was wondering, Is the airfoil and shape of the wing a lot different on the De Havilland ?
Because I can handle the difference in the Fuselage and tail group.

I have tried several times to email these people but it keeps comeing back to me !!!!!!!!!
http://www.modellbau-benja.de/ ...........or to see the plane............
http://www.modellbau-benja.de/Klemm_...5d_m__1_5.html
That is exactly what I want.

You guys really feel that the De Havilland is that much different ? Because actually through Bob Holman plans it would be much cheaper and be 109" wingspan.
I know it wouldnt be a perfect scale version of the Klemm L 25 but I could just cover it like it and build landing gear for it like the Klemm.

THANKS GUY'S, TIM