RCU Forums - View Single Post - pondering: District Websight Accountability
Old 09-23-2007 | 12:04 AM
  #21  
littlecrankshaf's Avatar
littlecrankshaf
My Feedback: (58)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: here
Default RE: pondering: District Websight Accountability


ORIGINAL: JUGFLIER

I'll be glad to tell you what has happened. It looks like Red has labeled me an AMA hater in the district 5 forums and has decided to kick me out. I have never made a post in that forum. The district 5 forum says that it is for all AMA members, esp those of dist 5. It really is not that big of a deal for me except that i get notices of funflys and other announcements from there to my email. If Red wants to act that way that is fine, my problem is that if he is going to use it to try to punish people he does not like or agree with then the link from Dist 5 web page needs to be removed. It is either for ALL dist 5 members or it isn't.

It seems that Tony Stillman is gutless to deal with it. He claims that Red is his friend, so, it looks like Tony is going to allow his friendship with Red to allow Red to use the District 5 website to settle his own personal scores. Tony is especially upset with my position with the firing of Steve K. and beraded me in an email. So now we have official AMA district five sanction of the persecution of anyone who does not toe the PARTY LINE. Today at the district 5 flyin in Harvest Al. Tony said he was here to help and support all AMA members, i guess thats all who drink the kool=aid and never ask questions.

Now guys we see the inner workings of the machinery. Could this be why Hoss was not on the ballot?
It never ceases to amaze me this type of vendetta and personal humiliation is allowed. The idea that sanctions should be taken against one member in favor of another is very disappointing to say the very least.

The only fair way to reconcile this matter is to either completely separate the forum from AMA's purview or see to it that all DV members can participate or take it to the final step and revoke the membership of the so-called offensive member. Anything less is just plain wrong.