RCU Forums - View Single Post - Are there double standards with Jets?
View Single Post
Old 10-18-2007 | 10:55 AM
  #17  
seanreit's Avatar
seanreit
My Feedback: (60)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,434
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Cedar Park, TX
Default RE: Are there double standards with Jets?


ORIGINAL: rhklenke

ORIGINAL: Ron S

http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_6468359/tm.htm

This is the FTiano thread. Its first page (for now) in the Scale RC forum of RCU...
Very interesting... I'm going to stay tuned to see what the AMA says. Personally, I think that this event has the potential to be safer than a jet speed event. Yes, I know that kinetic enegry is determined by both mass and speed and a big, slow model can be as destructive as a small, fast one. However, I think that the techniques for building very big models as opposed to very fast ones are simpler and better known to most experienced modelers, the strength needed for a heavy weight is more easily tested than that required for very fast speed, and a big, slow model is easier to get out of the way of if it starts to go astray...

Bob
FWIW, at Bomber Field a few weeks ago, a very experienced pilot was flying a large P-38, and lost an engine on take off. The airplane became unstable and went into the tents. Went through a tent and crashed into a $2,000 prop plane under the tent. People were running everywhere.

I've seen this happen a couple of times over the years, less than five. And the one thing that I have taken away from this, is that to state that a big slow model is easier to get out of the way if it starts to go astray, I believe is simply not true.

There is a joke a friend tells about a Ducted Fan F-4 that was headed to the pits a couple years ago. He says, "I looked at Doug, Doug looked at me, and we ran half a mile and only went 10 feet".

You simply can not anticipate with much accuracy which way to run IMO.