Bob-
Here is a quick demonstration of the problem.

Positive? Negative?
By what standard are we being judged? To wit just on one topic:
A) If we say we support membership tiers for cheaper E-Tickets, we are bashing & hating regular AMA.
B) If we say we dont support Tiered Membership, turns out we are bashing folks trying to improve the AMA

Which is the "Positive" side on that topic?
Clearly, whichever side we are not on at the moment.

Lest we forget the slurs we got for being Pro-Paintball,
yet it turns out that was the AMA way and still is today... the AMA even has the 2005 paperwork as PDF but that didnt stop us from being "Negataive" & ~Ruining AMA~ by supporting Paintball that was already being held at sanctioned events. The thread is still here at RCU, browse that bad boy & look at what we had to put up with from the "Positive" side... the side that was against the AMA

Positive & Negative are from a point of view:
We think yall are being negative by wanting to run MA in the RedInk.
Yall think we are being negative by wanting to not run MA in the RedInk.