I am still wondering if there is an apology in the works for downunder. He was called a lier and challenged on several points at least one of which has been backed up with data showing him to be correct. When the question is asked how someone can get away with telling such lies it is very offensive to some. I thought the rules of this site prohibited such postings. Mods please tell me what I am seeing wrong here. I must not get it. I certainly do not agree with everything DU posts but I never thought of him as telling lies. We all have opinions and sometimes have our facts wrong but that does not makes us liers. I'll go away now but I sure don't understand this one.