RCU Forums - View Single Post - Avistar or Lt-40??
View Single Post
Old 11-29-2007 | 03:36 PM
  #13  
dwilt72's Avatar
dwilt72
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Frisco, TX
Default RE: Avistar or Lt-40??


ORIGINAL: PipeMajor

My son and I both soloed on the LT-40 after 6 buddy box flight each a couple of years ago. It's a very forgiving airplane yet we've since bumped up the throws a bit and have moved the CG back another 3/8". Basic aerobatics is well within the abilities of an LT-40 with a 46 or better engine. We still fly the LT-40.

That said, I also came by an Avistar ARF in a bundled deal a few months ago. It's gonna get built er, assembled and rung out a bit more aggressively than the LT-40. To do that we're going to remove the dihedral in the Avistar. The LT-40 was built as per kit instructions.
I agree with the majority here in that you won't regret either plane. They are both great trainers. I have the LT-40 and LOVE it! It is well built and VERY tough....I've had a few hard landings and other than replacing the nose wheel gear, it's done fine. However, I also agree with PipeMajor here...spend a little more to get a little larger engine (at least a .46). I have an OS .40 LA and that's my only regret, that I got a larger motor.