P-51B -

Do double check, but IIRC AMA has tried to eliminate member to member coverage, but backed down to angry member feedback. It's kind of a moot point though, given the trend in the courts to favor the 'assumption of risk' defense. That makes member to member liability cases a long shot to win (for the claimant) anyway, and I suspect AMA would like to have it go away without having to pay the costs of legal defenses, and generate ill will amongst members when they win (i.e., do not pay). If you find an authoritative answer or something else on the issue to discuss, please start a new topic.

Abel