RCU Forums - View Single Post - LONG stroke vs. SHORT stroke (?????)
View Single Post
Old 01-25-2008 | 01:29 AM
  #29  
DarZeelon's Avatar
DarZeelon
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 8,913
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Rosh-HaAyin, ISRAEL
Default RE: LONG stroke vs. SHORT stroke (?????)


ORIGINAL: downunder

....

So in the real world long, or short stroke makes no difference as far as usable rev range goes.
Brian,


In a previous thread thread, this fact was discussed more elaborately...

All our engines; long-stroke and short-stroke, as someone else wrote here, are practically 'square', so I did not put more emphasis on this here, but this theoretical rev-limitation imposed by the long-stroke design really is a very minor limitation... The smaller, lighter piston makes it even more so.

The lighter (again - in theory) piston can endure higher acceleration forces, but it will wear faster, with all other things being equal.


Did you calculate the maximum piston acceleration numbers at TDC, or at BDC?