ORIGINAL: busted2props
Sure, more freedom, etc...Right! A new guy is in town, asks a local about a local flying field and is told about this field down the road. (2.4only)
Well... if the club in question would simply impose and enforce a 50 mile radius ban of guests and only allow club members to fly there, the club will then have ample opportunity to instruct him of proper freq. use when he is accepted...problem solved...just as they have rules on other aspects of freq. control, so would this be.
See, the secret is to have a greater area of restriction and impose more rules. Less freedom is more better.
BTW these types of what-if scenarios, as the one you used, are exactly the basis for greater areas of restriction...even heard of one club that had a fifty mile radius restriction on guests.
At one time the AMA even had a no tail touch rule also based on what-ifs…guess what…no ifs.