RCU Forums - View Single Post - IMAA
Thread: IMAA
View Single Post
Old 02-17-2008 | 11:40 AM
  #16  
frankp
Senior Member
My Feedback: (34)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Maryville, TN
Default RE: IMAA


ORIGINAL: Hossfly

ORIGINAL: frankp

As most of you know, the IMAA is the largest SIG within the AMA. Over the past eight years, the membership of the IMAA has dwindled and is now hovering around 6000 members. At the current rate of decline, the membership will fall to the mid 1980's level. Unfortunately, the Officers and Directors have done nothing to stem the tide of falling membership.

With the changing times in our hobby, the management of the IMAA has done nothing to update and modernize the IMAA mission statement or define what unique part the IMAA plays, or would like to play, in todays model aviation enviorment.

It is my opinion that unless the core membership of the IMAA becomes involved, the IMAA will go the way of the QSAA. If you feel as I do that the IMAA is in need of a new direction, please e-mail your thoughts and recomendations to me.

Frank V. Ponteri

//snip//

The question is do you as a member want the IMAA to survive and if so what would YOU do to improve that likelyhood? What I am seeking is recomendations!
IMAA is just like AMA. The Board has their little position and the membership does nothing about it.

IMAA tied the noose around their own neck when they traded with Dave Brown reference Sanctioning Procedures. When IMAA gave away the sanctioned event distance separations for AMA SIG status and insurance, IMAA started rolling down feces-hill gathering same as they accelerated downhill.
In the larger areas where there are a number of clubs, and a club obtains the IMAA/AMA sanction which is called Cr -- non rule book event with restricted entry -- then works for months to get a great show organized, and now 2 months before the event a nearby club, certain individuals with A/Hs on both ends of the torso, sanction an AMA C event through only AMA using IMAA's defined Big Bird sizes, then the IMAA Event loses half or more of its potential draw. [:@] This is reason enough to never sanction through IMAA, because doing so can well be a disaster. IMAA sits on its butt and does nothing to get that ball out of play. I have written about that but the Dist. Director is like an AMA DVP and simply says, "Uh Huh" when at a director's meeting. Without IMAA Sanctioned events in the area, who will even know such exists?

It is difficult enough to get guys to pay AMA dues and the numbers clearly indicate that group is on a downhill slide also. There is no reason for most fliers to think about IMAA. They can do their flying at regular AMA events. IMAC has captured the contemporary Big Bird people, other than the scale purists, which no longer need IMAA because there are adequate scale events and regular AMA Fly-Ins for their needs.

Like AMA depends on the Charter Clubs to sell their wares, IMAA tries to stand on some plank that has long faded away. Kind of like that guy all blindfolded and tied up being punched at with a sword on the plank over the deep sea. Just not a bright future when the leaders are all blindfolded, the membership doesn't care and only the sharks await. [X(]

Please correct me if I am wrong, but IIRC, a person can compete in an IMAC event without belonging to IMAC. The same goes for all other AMA sanctioned events which may be the event operated by a specific SIG, such as Pattern, Pylon and Scale.

Therefore:

(1) IMAA needs to immediately lobby Dave Mathewson and the AMA EC using IMAA Directors one-on-one with the AMA DVPs, and get that stupid assinine AMA Cr thing deleted with normal C separations between IMAA Fly-In events and regular AMA Fly-Ins.

(2) IMAA must allow Contest Directors to allow non-IMAA to fly in an IMAA Event, however with no elgibility for any awards, etc., but to get those people into the IMAA circle of friends and become knowledgeable about IMAA.

If IMAA fails to do this, then the hill will just get steeper.

While some IMAA officials may think that this IMAA member making the above statement is in violation of Article VII, Section 11 of the IMAA Bylaws, I think not because I plainly differentiate between IMAA's position and my own. [>:]

IMAA 04598 Chapter 148

Edited; Always have to type IMMA vice IMAA. []
Horrace,

It has been some time since we shared our thoughts on the IMAA. As usual, you are on the mark. Many of the items you have mentioned were contained in a motion that I presented to the board at the last meeting that I attended prior to resigning as D1 director. Needless to say my motion fell of deaf ears. I see that at the last meeting, the board passed a watered down version of part of what I had proposed. Too little too late!

The sorry part about what is now happening with the IMAA is the total lack of leadership. The IMAA board of directors in conjuction with the president, changed the bi-laws in order to eliminate the winter board meeting. The 2008 board meeting will be held in June in CANADA at the IMAA Rally. The reason given for NOT having the winter meeting was that the board COULD NOT COME UP WITH AND AGENDA!! The IMAA is loosing members and money, advertising is dwindling, the budget is bloted and they could not come up with and agenda??

I would like to say a few words about District 12, Canada. This district covers a land mass that goes from the Atlantic to the Pacific ocean and from the US boarder to the artic circle. Some years ago, the IMAA board decided to allow a director to represent this district. All of it! The total membership of District 12 is less that 200 members. I have no idea how many of those members live within 500 miles of their district director or the location of this years IMAA Rally. The point is that having a single director for and area of this size is a waste of thousands of IMAA membership dues. I have asked the District V IMAA Director to propose a motion eliminating district 12. The district, under my proposal would be broken up into three or four sections that boarder the US and extend northward. Members within the sections would become members in good standing of the US District. The could run for District Director or any other elected position within the IMAA. As and example, Eastern Canada would become part of District One. This plan will save the IMAA thousands of dollars each year and give the membership in Canada greater access to their director.

I intend to forward your suggestions to my director for his consideration.

Frank P