RCU Forums - View Single Post - After mastering a "second plane", what next?
Old 02-20-2008 | 12:14 PM
  #10  
NorfolkSouthern
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,588
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Default RE: After mastering a "second plane", what next?

Another idea that popped into my mind is the Hangar-9 Tango. Mike McConfille recommended it as a "third plane" in another thread. The thick airfoil would allow for slower flights, yet the larger control surfaces could add more agility and quicker response. I have talked with some people about the Hangar-9 Twist, and they all say it can be quite docile with low rates. The Tango might be similar, with the added high-wing stability. Perhaps it could be well suited as a third plane, but I would like to read more before I press mine into service.

I will pass on the Ultimate for now, from what I've read here. Building isn't exactly the most pleasant of activities for me, even though I have put the Rapture together successfully. And it looks like the Ultimate would give me a bit more than I bargained for. I think another option would be either the Great Planes Venus II, or Venus 40, both patter planes. Should I decide to go with another kit, chances are I may seriously consider Minn Flyer's suggestion of the Ultra Sport. I am thinking I could also try the Great Planes Cessna again, after sharpening my skills with the Rapture. So far, I have these to consider as "third planes":

1. Sig Hog Bipe
2. Great Planes Ultimate
3. Great Planes Super Sportster
4. Great Planes U-Can-Do
5. Piper J-3 Cub

I'm not sure of these, but perhaps they could be considered:

6. Great Planes Cessna 182
7. Great Planes Venus 40
8. Great Planes Venus II
9. Hangar-9 Tango
10. Hangar-9 Twist

So far, would my list of "third planes" be considered as accurate?

And here are some that might be more advanced:

1. Great Planes Ultimate 40
2. Hangar-9 Funtana

Folks, what I am arriving at is sort of a skill level guide, based on what I've been reading and advice from other pilots. It is my personal feeling that Hobbico's guide may not be accurate. I'm thinking that a guide would be of great benefit for beginners, something we should all work on based on our experiences. It would allow people to advance in the hobby, and could save a good deal of money an headaches. What do you all think?

NorfolkSouthern