Exactly....if you read the article this type of pass has been done by him and this plane before (several times by the way it reads).

Infact, only after the video was put online and people voiced concerns did the company admit there was no "waiver" and fired the pilot.


Of course we are only hearing one side of the story. I bet the company encouraged the flyby, but when push came to shove they didn't stand behind the pilot and used the fact there was no waiver to save face.


Does anyone know who's responsiblity it was to get the waiver? The pilot or the company?