RCU Forums - View Single Post - HELP..why not two UAT!??
View Single Post
Old 04-26-2008 | 02:25 AM
  #24  
rcdriver22's Avatar
rcdriver22
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Newcastle, UNITED KINGDOM
Default RE: HELP..why not two UAT!??


ORIGINAL: David Gladwin

there is a supplementary tank with a clunk, and this acts as a collector and a primary air tank. Result is there is never any air in the UAT on this model

feeds the 6 ounce hopper (not a UAT) and there is NEVER any air in the hopper after an aerobatic flight, any air stays in the intermadiate tank and the clunk always stays in the fuel.

Regards, David Gladwin.

George

Follow David's advice its based on sound flying experience. By having a full intermediate tank its possible to bunt, cobra, flick, neg G, inverted spin or any flight path you might fly. I wouldn't patent the drawing LOL thats just too complicated when the answer is so straight forward.

Paul