Considering Bluetooth isn't related to this discussion I would rather we not drag people where
they don't need to go... : ) There are already too many buzz words used interchangably with
respect to recreational rc systems currently available on 2.4G and their real world counterparts
within the intelligent WiFi environment.

As an example... 2.4 can not be used legally in Japan to name one large RC market and home
to a manufacturer. This whole thing could or would have made more sense down on 700 or 800
where everyone would have benefited from an increase in range and a reduction in onboard
power management.

Co-habitating 35/40/50/70 narrow band with FHSS permits a smart marketing scheme where-in
you automatically assure you keep your customer once acquired since you are known for upward
usage mobility : ). Seems it would be the best solution considering the minority of the DSSS that
exists today. The EU would be most happy with this I am sure. It can open the market for you
everywhere else...

Antenna technology is what has permitted effeciencies to be realized. I would imagine that would
be a premier focus for your company.