RCU Forums - View Single Post - What IS or SHOULD BE "Classic Pattern"?
Old 06-17-2008 | 10:41 PM
  #6  
rainedave's Avatar
rainedave
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,344
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Richmond, VA
Default RE: What IS or SHOULD BE "Classic Pattern"?

Since SPA doesn't allow pipes or retracts I've never really understood the 1975 cutoff. Planes in the late '70s and early '80s were getting bigger and heavier. Flying an EU1-A, a Brushfire or an XLT with a non-piped, side exhaust sixty is not an advantage over flying a smaller Curare or Dirty Birdy with the same engine. In fact, it would probably be a handicap since these later planes need the extra power of the hotter rear exhaust piped engines to fly their best. Does that make sense? I mean, if I had to use a side exhaust, non-piped sixty I probably wouldn't choose an 850 sq." design. Right? So, what practical effect does the '75 cutoff serve?

Just my own thoughts and opinion.

david