I do not wish to conflict with any of the posters, especially several that I like and respect. I trained with the Nexstar Select and solo'ed with it. It's a fine aircraft and trainer, no matter what configuration you select. That's my official opinion.

However, I my instructor tried the AFS and we both decided to not use it. I actually removed the entire Futaba system and installed my own Airtronics RD6000 radio system, including the servos.

Why? Only because I had the radio system and wanted to learn using that system. Simple as that.

The flaw in that decision was that I was using a buddy box which eliminated any of the computer advantages I had with the RD6000. So, there was really no difference for me a a student, with the RD6000 system.

Once I solo'ed, though, I did realize the differences and enjoyed them until I advanced to my second aircraft, a Goldberg Tiger 60.

The RTF configuration of the NexStar has some very good advantages, in my opinion. They include their Real Flight version of the Nexstar Flight Simulator software. If you use it, it is a great way to practice certain factors of learning RC in times that you cannot fly outdoors.

Personally, I think this is a great trainer and a pretty good value for the money.

I cannot sign out without saying this. There are other trainer systems out there that are less cost than the NexStar. That's true, and it would not be fair if I did not say that there are are others out there that will do exactly what the NexStar does but for less cost.

One big advantage that the NexStar has, though, is it's size. Visibility is very important for the new RC'ers out there. It is bigger than some, if not most of the trainers out there. So look over all specifications of the new aircraft you are shopping for and make sure what you get is what you want. Always consider the cost versus what you are getting for the money. If you do that, you will find that the NexStar is right there with a lot, if not most of the competition out there.

CGr.