RCU Forums - View Single Post - AMA Financials
Thread: AMA Financials
View Single Post
Old 07-25-2003 | 04:25 AM
  #33  
J_R
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Corona, CA,
Default AMA Financials

Originally posted by Hossfly
>>>>>>>
I have never seen or heard anyone at the EC or HQ level claim that the entire dues increase was due to, or for, increased insurance.
<<<<<<<,


Yep, smoke and mirrors do it every time. In my cabin up NAWTH, I have a cute little item that looks so much like a wood burning fireplace, simply by lights and reflective mirrors. A small electric heater is built in to provide adequate warm air for those cool early mornings and late evenings. Cozy!!!


From EC minutes:
November 04, 2000, Mr. Holland brought up the topic of restructuring the AMA.

July 09, 2001, EVP reported working with lawyers on separating AMA assets. ---- Also discussed need for increase in member dues. -----

May 04, 2002, EVP uses AMA Marketing Director for explaining to EC how to make a dues increase "....sound rationale....to justify changes..."

The dues increase was in the making while politicians were planning how to make it sound rational and justified. The 2003 increase in allocation to this new high color MA is, in my opinion, a good batch of it, from 12 to $18. (Page 6)
Where is that in the EC minutes? Guess it was part of a "Budget Approval".
November 4, 2000

JR comment: I find no reference to the EVP suggesting any such thing, however I did find this:
"Bylaws/Standing Rules - B. Brown

The Chairman stated that the minor problems encountered with regard to the nominating procedures can be resolved by adding fifteen days to each item on the nominating schedule. The Chairman recommended, and the President agreed, there may be a need to look at restructuring the Academy. Not to be less responsive to the membership, but to protect the organization as a whole so it can continue to service the membership. The President questioned whether a committee should be formed within the board, to decide on a process that this can be done. The process should include combined expertise from outside of the board. The bylaws will need to be brought up to date. The Chairman agreed to develop a motion to address the issue for the next meeting if he receives input from other Council members on the direction they wish to take.

July 9, 2001

JR comment: Horrace, there appears to be a twist in your words

"EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT'S REPORT

Will start organizing the program for debt reduction (brick program, plaque, etc.), and charitable remainder trust.
The EVP is working with a lawyer on separating AMA's assets. Suggestions will be brought to Council for review prior to any action being taken. Funding for legal expenses are already in place.
A Common Paymaster has now been set up."

"Postage Increase Discussion-HQ
The Executive Director informed council that the post office is issuing a postal increase for 2002.It was determined that this increase will be publicized by the AMA, and member will realize that it will affect the Academy. The ED and EVP will discuss a possible dues increase for 2003 to combat this expense. The editor noted that AMA realized a 12% increase in cost for sending out the magazine last year."

May 4, 2002

JR comment: Horrace, you have completely mislead the readers.

"Dues Structure – Schwinn

The ED introduced Tom Schwinn, AMA Marketing Director; who made a presentation on dues analysis projections. Discussion brought about various ideas on areas where changes could be made to assist in minimizing a dues increase, yet continue to provide a level of service to the members that is acceptable. Whatever modifications are made need to have sound rationale behind them to justify the changes to the membership.

Council will meet July 14 for further discussion on dues structure. The Insurance Committee will present its findings on the alternative insurance study at this meeting."

Horrace, are you posting misleading statements intentionally? Is this another of your conspiracy theories? Are all of your conspiracy theories based on misrepresentations like this?

I have to assume that you mean page 6 of the 2002 financial statement. Not sure what you mean. My real reaction to reading your entire post is: HUH?

If this is your idea of how to run for office,Horrace, I suggest you submit your resignation.... NOW. If anyone else understands the misrepresentations and general BS, please set me straight.

JR