Bob, I was addressing the text from Hoss in the OP.
And the allegations you find in Hoss' text.
ORIGINAL: Hossfly
Actually, I don't think the Park Fliers themselves have even requested such. The word on the street is that a certain AMA Official has partnered with a couple big wigs in the model airplane industry to formulate, initiate, and promote this AMA special privilege group. Don't you think you are being somewhat "used" for the benefit of a small round table of persons feathering their own nests. I certainly feel that wind blowing.
I am a park flyer. Have been for years.
I fly AP, Cox, Norvel planes in the park... most of them (non-twins) fit the 2/60 rule.
I have not requested AMA to make their own definition of PArkflyer as electric only.
I too think some industry interests influenced that.
I would explain this further, the influences I suspect,
but just did in my previous post on what Hoss said and the allegation found by folks in Hoss' comments.