Red
Note how many elections had 3 nominees (these are the only ones where possibly all the nominees didn't make the ballot.)
Notice how many listed Horrace Cain, so these could be eliminated as keeping him from appearing on the ballot.
Once again we get a partial partisan skewed set of data.
To say that this set of results demonstrates that Hoss hasnt been keep off the ballot kinda misses the mark... in that both last year that was very much the case and it has been discussed here already: We KNOW he was kept off last year, so your list doesnt show he hasnt been kept off time & time again. As well as you neglecting to list the year he was AN INCUMBANT KEPT OFF THE BALLOT! Spin that one as you want, but iirc as the non-balloted incumbant he won BY WRITE-IN.
Red, if you think I am misrepresenting the points in the year Hoss won by write-in (& that preceding election), please explian the details of just what happened those years as you see it.... what were the circumstances that led to Hoss wining by Write-in.
Now, when the incumbant is kept off, with so much member support that he won by write-in,
were the Good Ole Boys working against Hoss,
or were the good ole boys working against the membership?
Hey, who cares who the members want, the EC controls the ballot printing.
BOB
Digest what I just said to Red.
Then ask Hoss for the name of the guy that found the uncounted Hoss votes back in the day.
I find many things folk declare about Muncie need to be appended with ", again."
MA will never become Optional ", again."
Muncie could never rig elections ", again."
etc
out and out election fraud. I'm not yet cynical enough to go there
You should schedule some time for a trip there in the near future.
Hoss' write-in a Dead Horse?
This thread is discussing the nomination process, and this in particular
is an example of something about the election process we should change.
It is supposedly just a series of coincidences that a lot of the examples of stuff that just aint right involve the cheifs slamming Hoss.