Bob,
Here, I will cede the point to Red for your semantics:
Red did list that there was at least one time Hoss wasnt kept off the ballot.

However
looks clear enough to me that the reason Red would even mention Hoss being there
would be to illustrate that Hoss is not kept off ballots.
No duh he hasnt been kept off all ballots, he is on one now [&:]

But why try to sell it like he hasnt been, when we know he has - something that wasnt mentioned by Red,
along with his data not getting into the OFF BALLOT INCUMBANT nor highlighting the other year (last year, which is in his data) he was indeed kept off.

Red wasnt selling it that only once in a while Hoss has been kept off,
it was packaged as ignoring the times he has along with showing he hasnt to paint a tinted picture.
Just as the other Reds List that showed Hoss as unelectable, but Red somehow dropped Hoss' wins from his list but include elections he wasnt even running in.

Bob, as long as you are looking at the some/all semantics,
I didnt say he was kept off "all" ballots just as Red didnt say all either.
When I said he was kept off the ballot, that doesnt make refernce to the count, frequency, nor totality of it.

. .

I doubt they would even try to pull something that obviously wrong.... even with a closed door meeting the candidate would scream bloody murder. But horrific events seem to get back burnered into a Muncie Myth, that folks later choose to treat as just a myth or lacking in fact.... such as uncounted ballots you should ask Hoss about. But stories get adjusted it seems, like Red dragging in testimonials that Hoss had nothing to do with the 81 Freq Deal... plenty of old guys around that will protect Muncie & slam Hoss by playing loose with interpreting the facts.