I had a Tiger 60 and a four star 40. Although there was a size difference, I really liked the Tiger 60, slightly over the Four Star 40. The Tiger was my second plane, and was very stable. It taught me how to fly the low wing semi-performance plane (it is a *****-cat in the sky, but it can definitely do things) and a bit slower and bigger than the four star.

Now, I know you said the Four Star 60. Well, from what I can see, they are pretty much alike, as already mentioned, but I think that the Tiger 60 is probably a better choice for a second plane or a next follow up from a high-wing aircraft. It is easy to fly and is very forgiving. Either way, one big advantage of the 60 size is.... the size. You can see it and see what it is doing, especially on landing, which really helpes develop good landing habits.

CGr