RE: weatronic problem
The problem is that it is the engineers that translate (or try) to English. They miss a step in their minds, thus you have to go from page 2 to page 22. If an American would only sit down and translate the bad translation to English and with simplicity (such as with the landing gear), we all would be happy. Isn't there a "2.5ghz X For Dummies" out there? I think RC Reports had a brief on the Futaba, could it have been written for the layman? And that brings up the other problem. Everyone that does reviews ASSUMES that everyone that reads it, looking for simplicity and help, is as experienced as they are! How about a new idea? Just perhaps the person reading a review is totally uneducated in the matter and is looking for a simple explanation!?!?!?!?!?!