Robo
Yes, that is exactly what the AMA club is doing.
Only AMA clubs can have "conflict", the Public has "interfering with freq in use" problems.
3mins before the club site opens for the day, the freq is not in use and there is no public interference problems so the nonmembers can switch on and use the freq for as long as they can keep the tx on..... but even before the site opens for the day the AMA club KNOWS about a "conflict" and cant switch on till a signed freq sharing plan is in place.


As for running around trying to get flying sites shut down,
how would that club feel if someone contacted their AMA District FreqDude and mentioned the Known Conflict and had the club shut down by the AMA?

Remember, Muncie added non-member sites to the list of entities that a freq sharing plan can be between. AMA has provided the rules about conflict that restrict only its members, as well as providing the definition of sharing plan to have clubs sign with non-members. Why add non-member entities to the types of sharing plans? Because clubs are supposed to get said freq sharing plans with non-member entities. AMA has laid out the rules clubs have to follow...... SO DO IT! rather than come up with something, anything, to do other than follow Muncies rules.

Is the strategy for that club to
Continue breaking Muncies freq conflict rules
and hope they can get a flying site shutdown before someone forces them to obey AMA rules?
Great plan, I really love the part that deals with the now Irate Rogues simply moving off county land but still using the freqs within conflict range (we can assume every last Rogue that got his site shutdown by the club will be a stand up guy and not sit somewhere a mile away with a Dial-a-Freq tx shooting down club planes... I'm sure they will be enamored with the club for getting their site shut down)

Do those Rogues hate the AMA?
All doubt will be removed once the club shuts down their site.
Way to promote the hobby, break your own rules to be intentionally detrimental to public flyers.