It's amazing how the Anti-club, anti-AMA sentiments come to light. Are you two licking your chops and drooling at the prospect of an established club loosing their flying site? I bet the fact they are AMA chartered is like A1 sauce. You guys smelling red meat about now? Why haven't you popped off an anonymous email turning them in? You can be crappy but not that crappy?

Good grief.

Maybe when you get over your glee over someone else’s misfortune you can enlighten us as to where in this paragraph taken verbatim from HC's quote of the AMA reg. an AMA club can enter into a frequency agreement with the "rogue" (read idiot) flyers. Emphasized text added.

"A frequency-management agreement may exist between two or more AMA chartered clubs, (No, not this one. The "rogues" are not chartered) AMA clubs and individual AMA members, (Nope, not here. They aren't AMA members as far as I can gather from the OP) or individual AMA members. (Darn, not this one either.) Frequency-management agreements, including an interference test report if the agreement indicates no interference exists, will be signed by all parties and copies provided to AMA Headquarters."