ORIGINAL: KidEpoxy
Is that your stand?
That the club is so flagrantly violating Muncies rules that they would get shutdown if we dont keep it hushhush and hidden from our own org?
I asked, you state.
There is a difference. What I said was there is also a case where they have no reason to fear a shutdown: What they are doing dont violate Muncie rules. Why are you assuming/deducing that is not the case? Why are you not thinking Muncie will give them the thumbs up on the matter and have no reason to shut them down. I said that was wholely possibleyet you doscounted the possibility of their innocence.
Huh? Where in the heck did I ever say they were not violating AMA regs? Now you're making crap up. If they fly knowing there is a conflict they are violating the AMA regs. Period. Never been up for discussion. Way to try to make a point by just making crap up.
They are planning to resolve the issue. We're debating how that situation should be resolved. You say bring 'em donuts and kiss their arses for entroaching on an established site. I say, have the landowner boot the littel miscreants and limit all flying to the 20 year established site. The only mitigating issue left is whether they charge to fly at the site. I don't know that and neither do you. You bleat about keeping the flying public out. Not true. Just regulate where that may occur. You say that this would lead to the miscreants to hate the AMA.
ORIGINAL: KidEpoxy
Robo, your presumption of guilt in the matter kinda indicates you think they are breaking the rules you have presumed them guilty of.... how else could Muncie knowing what is going on cause a shutdown.
Duh. Brilliant observation.
ORIGINAL: KidEpoxy
No, the clubbers make friends with the rogues rather than ama haters
and get a sharing agreement and have their friends remind other new guys about interference.
According to the OP that has been tried. The outlaw flyers, have refused to fly at the 20 year old, established club.
ORIGINAL: KidEpoxy
and get a sharing agreement and have their friends remind other new guys about interference.
Wait a minute. The safety of club members, innocent bystanders, and the cost of a GSP should rest on an agreement made with an unidentifiable entity and their promise to what, stand guard 24-7 to warn new outlaw/miscreants?
What world do you live in? Would you really risk an expensive model to this agreement? Right. Say you would.
My position, if you care for accuracy, from the beginning of this thread, is for the club to go to the landowner and get the miscreants off the boat launch parking lot and on the designated site set aside for RC flying activities.
Your position in this thread, so far as I can decipher, is that enough folks hate the AMA already so arse kissing and donuts are in order. Cartoon blue birds and unicorns farting rainbows will fill the sky.
[