RCU Forums - View Single Post - Changes to Experimental Regs
Thread: Changes to Experimental Regs
View Single Post
Old 01-03-2009 | 09:28 PM
  #39  
mr_matt's Avatar
mr_matt
My Feedback: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,450
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Oak Park, CA,
Default RE: Changes to Experimental Regs
ORIGINAL: pilott28


If I understand the question correctly, it will be up to the inspector to use judgement if the installation would reduce thrust (e.g. bifurcated pipe). The intent of the regulation as I would interpret it is actual installed thrust. The rule is silent as to this point.
Then why not have the inspector measure installed thrust?

EDIT: Thanks in advance and sorry if I am missing something obvious.
mr_matt is offline  
Reply Like