RCU Forums - View Single Post - Changes to Experimental Regs
View Single Post
Old 01-04-2009 | 01:00 AM
  #41  
pilott28
My Feedback: (27)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Jasper, GA
Default RE: Changes to Experimental Regs


ORIGINAL: mr_matt

ORIGINAL: pilott28


If I understand the question correctly, it will be up to the inspector to use judgement if the installation would reduce thrust (e.g. bifurcated pipe). The intent of the regulation as I would interpret it is actual installed thrust. The rule is silent as to this point.
Then why not have the inspector measure installed thrust?

EDIT: Thanks in advance and sorry if I am missing something obvious.
I agree with Bob.