ORIGINAL: bruce88123
Again, you ASSUMED the search object was to be out of line-of-sight (often not the case in real life, just not easily detectable by the naked eye) and ASSUMED he knows nothing of restrictions or camera requirements.
Why yes I did... a VERY SAFE assumption given the words "SEARCH AND RESCUE"... you can search and rescue victims w/o flying equipment if they are IN the line of sight..
What is your point though?
What is WRONG with making an assumption?
ORIGINAL: bruce88123
Some of your assumptions may bear fruit but are not based upon facts in evidence in the original post.
Except for the request for info on the IR camera & SR&R, there are no other "facts" in the orignal post.
So if I "assumed" something, what's the problem?
Are you ASSUMING I'm wrong?
If so you're speculating! Mustn't have that!!!!
