RCU Forums - View Single Post - Flying field dilemma
View Single Post
Old 02-07-2009 | 12:38 PM
  #14  
littlecrankshaf's Avatar
littlecrankshaf
My Feedback: (58)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: here
Default RE: Flying field dilemma


ORIGINAL: evan-RCU


ORIGINAL: littlecrankshaf

What a bunch of stuff.

You guys are not to be believed. [:'(]

Have you ever considered Munis have liabilities and insurance for swimming pools, Soccer fields, Skateboard parks etc..

It is just disgusting to see people here play the liability card just to be selfish with what could be a great public flying site.

How soon most of you forget what the AMA is truly about...promoting the hobby instead of excluding hobbyist.


Heck, Let the county make everyday a Non-AMA required day if possible. It doesn't negate your insurance one bit.


Do Get behind the county while they are pro Aero modeling and increase the chances of more flying sites for everyone.


Do not pee in your sand box by citing catastrophic, world ending danger as some here would have you do...that would definitely be a mistake...you could lose it all. I have seen that first hand.

I agree with you. What ever they do I think should be all the time though.

But I think there is more to this than meets the eye. The "concerned citizens" that don't want to belong to the AMA, don't want to conform to safety rules, what else? I believe these people that went to the county are the same people that don't want to pay for the park pass and leave notes on the park bulletin board about refusing to play by the rules and nobody can stop them, childish...

At what point does the county just say go away. They have almost done it in the recent past. This could close us down easily.
We have a similar situation here and the Non- AMAers are some of the most considerate. Heck, it is the AMAers that are the ones we have problems with... Maybe the non-AMAers are being rubbed the wrong way.